Cult Inversion

"To tell you the truth you're not the first person I've met, declaring himself/herself that wise, perceptive being that agressive. That just shows how little confidence they have in fact, and the little they really can share with people. They just don't really care about people, they just try to give themselves importance. I've already seen in spiritual groups people who are not important in real life, frustrated, becoming suddenly tough, arrogant once they get some responsability in those groups. And you certainly have already realized that the wise person never talk that way, they even never call themselves wise. You show it in your life, and people around you just witness the kind of person you are."

The quote above is from a French freemason I had a nasty encounter with online in the first few years of my awakening. I don't really want to go into the backstory here because I've talked about it enough over the years and there are other blog posts which go into that matter. The reason the quote came to mind is because recently I was watching a podcast interview and Charles Manson's name came up. It was mentioned how he had written this "beautiful" country song. Every now and then over the years something I watch or someone I engage with directly will reference him or cults in general, usually in quite a subtle way, but with a passive aggressive element. It has only been occurring since the encounter with the French freemason.

As you can see, he tried to imply I was some manipulative, aggressive, spiritual guy trying to gain power and importance over people. At that time, I was living a simple life with Kate, my girlfriend at the time. No groups of people around me, spiritual or otherwise. That is still the case all these years later, so if I was trying to set myself up in such a way, I'm obviously not very good at it! Funnily enough, I also sometimes get accused of pushing people away! So which is it?

At that time, I was feeling strongly compelled to share insights and revelations that were coming through me, on the David Icke forum and also in private messages to his wife, whom I had got to know through Kate at first, and then directly through the David Icke website. When you operate from Truth, you say and do things often without knowing fully why. The why doesn't come into it. There is just a kind of pure action without worrying about the consequences. I could say in hindsight, perhaps I was feeling what was coming - the transhumanist, Big Tech dystopian scenario we are now on the verge of and was trying to urgently warn people. The reason I never made any friends there was because I was all about connecting with people in person - and still am! - and didn't particularly want to build a bunch of online friends as then I'd have to spend more of my time looking at screens and using devices. Animals move to safer ground ahead of natural disasters they say, and we have those senses also. All I can say is it was all well-intended but he certainly didn't take it that way.

What I really want to focus on here is the projection because it has been a recurring theme. When someone is trying to do something of their own accord, to break away from the system, so to speak, one of the tactics used against them is to imply they are starting a cult. This is classic masonic inversion. The biggest cult of all is "normal society". When you are born, they issue you with a birth certificate without your consent. Is that not cultish behaviour? This birth certificate follows you around the rest of your life and is necessary for further means of control. You can't travel to other countries without it because you need it to get a passport. You need it for a bank account and to enrol at school, and to get married.

Key signs of a cult are often stated as isolating members from the outside world, which is what a passport does. Controlling relationships within the cult (ie. the leader has final say on relationships with family and friends), which is ultimately what politicians do. If you doubt that, consider what happened during the Covid period where family members were kept apart, some even dying without being able to see each other. On more subtle levels, the government can deny people the ability to see each other for many reasons. Cults often alternate fear messages with the idea the cult is the only safe place. Again, see the Covid period for extreme examples of this but it has carried on as everyday they are putting out fearful messages in the media and then offering you safety from their 'experts', whether that is science or politics or whatever. It is frowned upon to not take their advice. I could go on and on but everywhere you look within this system we are born into, it is the very definition of a cult.

They don't want you to know this, and it is only because it is all around you from cradle to grave that you don't notice. Like in the Truman Show, they try to make sure you never see beyond the confines of the 'world' you inhabit. But some of us do see beyond. Like lightning striking, some are struck and a crack in the walls appears and they begin to realise this life, this world, is nothing at all like we were made to believe.

The education system is really an indoctrination system. The "confidence" issue which the French freemason threw at me in the quote above is another common tactic. I had it continually said to me growing up. In whatever activities I involved myself, such as football, the moment it became too organised my instincts were to pull away. Or when things became too routine or ritualistic, I shied away. That was my soul rebelling against this cultish indoctrination. I intuitively knew we are meant to live spontaneously, moment to moment. We are not supposed to be forced to do anything or to not to do something. We are supposed to do whatever we feel like in any given moment. It was not a confidence issue, because when everything is aligned (people, location, timing) I am not afraid to do anything. To control me, they needed to tell me again and again it was a lack of self-confidence, until I started to doubt myself.

The truth is those who are well-indoctrinated into the cult are the ones lacking in self-confidence. They can't think for themselves, stand on their own two feet, make their own decisions about life. They always need to be held by the hand, shown and told what to do by others. This makes them feel safe. In recent years, I've even seen this clearly in people I used to admire, people who I was under the impression were coming from the same place as me. The idea people who are not important in real life need to inflate themselves by becoming tough and arrogant when they get responsibility in groups... isn't that what politicians do? Isn't that what many in the business world do, as shown in films like Wall Street? And you all listen to, connect with and work for these people!

I mean, what does it mean to be "important in real life"? You ARE life! You are already important otherwise you wouldn't exist! What they are really saying is you are only of importance if you serve this cult (also known as society). Your life has no value or importance outside of that. They need you to believe this so they can control you, so they can shame you and make you feel guilty if you are not contributing. If you are freed from that cult mind, you will contribute to life, because life doesn't make mistakes, but your contribution may not be valued or understood by the society, because you will be working for Creation itself. A bee doesn't contribute to society, it contributes to the whole of life, it's own species as well as all other life on this planet. Why would a human being be any different?

A free human being isn't interested in showing or demonstrating their value to others, for some kind of approval. This is more cultish behaviour. Status, trying to impress the others in the group. You see this everywhere in society, most notably perhaps in the invention of charity.

In recent years, I've been observing the hysteria and attention celebrity deaths attract. In the past, you would hear it on the news and the newspapers. People might mention it briefly the next day and that would be it. Now, almost every single famous person's death goes into overdrive and on social media, you almost feel left out if you don't contribute, it's so expected. I've seen people attacked for just carrying on with their lives when others feel they should be acknowledging someone's death. Recently, I realised why... of course, it's a Death Cult! The society, which we call normal, is a Death Cult. The medical system's focus is on preventing death, not staying alive and everything else in society is built around it. As so much else about this cult is coming to the surface - the insanity, the greed, the corruption of those in power - it makes sense that the obsession with death would also show itself more intensely.

I notice the cult and Charles Manson references usually come my way when I'm making breakthroughs, when I'm being felt as a threat by those still within the cult (society). When I'm starting to get more attention, more notice, more reach for my work. To cover themselves, they have to suggest and put out there warnings to the others in the cult who may be paying attention to what I'm saying. It threatens their apparent stability and safety.

The irony is if their cult wasn't dominating the Earth, taking over all the resources and land, then I would quietly and happily live my life in peace doing my thing. It is only because of their impositions that I feel the need to speak out so we can assist each other in breaking away from the cult. The fact it is made so difficult to leave is another classic sign of a cult.

That time is coming to an end now. It is beyond their control as the extreme gulf between those who wish to live an organic, spontaneous, free, loving and open life versus those who wish to live in fear, routine, security and control in a high-tech society is just too vast now.

This is what the recent push of AI is about. In the last year or so we seem to have been flooded with AI-related stuff all over social media, whether fake AI photos & video, endless discussions on the pros and cons of it, and all kinds of promises about the Utopia it will bring to humanity in the future. This is because the system knows we are starting to see through the human level of control. Everyone now knows how crazy and corrupt politicians are, that they only offer empty promises. People are becoming disillusioned with the entertainment world, no longer impressed by celebrity. It's all falling apart and so now they try to come in a new way (the new normal), offering this paradise future where AI will do everything and nobody will need to work, everything will be provided. It is their distorted version of what would already be there without any control system. As more are realising why should I have to work and pay taxes to exist on this Earth, they need to rearrange the furniture and make themselves look like the good guys again by saying AI can take care of it all. But who is taking care of AI? There is a huge difference between the Earth itself providing for humanity and Big Tech's AI doing so. Any day of the week I'll go for the one that Man's thinking mind has no involvement in! In all the time Man has been on this Earth he's never been able to organise the most basic of things - food and shelter for every human on this planet. Yet the Earth itself is part of an intelligence that orchestrates the whole Universe!

A split is coming and everyone can feel and sense it one way or another. We will eventually live in separate worlds. There is nothing they can do to stop it and like any cult which is exposed, they are flapping and flailing around in panic and chaos. Those of us who are leaving the system cult still see much of this but it cannot touch us and more and more it is fading away.